<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Banners don&#8217;t work because they don&#8217;t have time to be seen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/</link>
	<description>Social Media is about Cliques not Clicks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotthoffman</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>scotthoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Stanley &amp; Dan - your both right - &quot;75% of consumers will seek the advice of their peers on social networks prior to making a purchase online.&quot; but that doesn&#039;t come from banners which is the issue...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;my 2 cents&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS Dan, do you have a link to that 75% research?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley &#038; Dan &#8211; your both right &#8211; &#8220;75% of consumers will seek the advice of their peers on social networks prior to making a purchase online.&#8221; but that doesn&#39;t come from banners which is the issue&#8230;</p>
<p>my 2 cents</p>
<p>PS Dan, do you have a link to that 75% research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivv</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>ivv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Eyetracking studies (&lt;a href=&quot;http://pointer.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pointer.org&lt;/a&gt;) done on display ads show that those are looked at for an average of one second in general, regardless (if I remember correctly) of how much time people spend on the page, so it is not a problem particular just to the social media sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eyetracking studies (<a href="http://pointer.org" rel="nofollow">pointer.org</a>) done on display ads show that those are looked at for an average of one second in general, regardless (if I remember correctly) of how much time people spend on the page, so it is not a problem particular just to the social media sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Redman</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Redman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-209</guid>
		<description>75% of consumers will seek the advice of their peers on social networks prior to making a purchase online.  I&#039;d call that a pretty strong, though underlying intent source.  Search isn&#039;t even a comparable, as it&#039;s pull and social ads are push strategy.  Different stage of the funnel. Stanley, you are flat out Wong.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re not really, I just wanted to say that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>75% of consumers will seek the advice of their peers on social networks prior to making a purchase online.  I&#39;d call that a pretty strong, though underlying intent source.  Search isn&#39;t even a comparable, as it&#39;s pull and social ads are push strategy.  Different stage of the funnel. Stanley, you are flat out Wong.  </p>
<p>You&#39;re not really, I just wanted to say that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banner Blindness, double whammy on Social Media Display Ads</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Banner Blindness, double whammy on Social Media Display Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-202</guid>
		<description>[...] display advertisement, whether or not it&#8217;s actually an ad. Banner blindness is exacerbated in Social Media, where banners get an average of 1-2 seconds of exposure before the user moves on to the next [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] display advertisement, whether or not it&#8217;s actually an ad. Banner blindness is exacerbated in Social Media, where banners get an average of 1-2 seconds of exposure before the user moves on to the next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Wong</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Completely agree with this post.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Social media exhibits the same level of banner blindness and limited exposure time that we&#039;ve seen on things like Webmail (Y! Mail, Hotmail, etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition to this problem, there isn&#039;t any monetizable intent within the context of Social Media like you have with search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with this post.  </p>
<p>Social media exhibits the same level of banner blindness and limited exposure time that we&#39;ve seen on things like Webmail (Y! Mail, Hotmail, etc.).</p>
<p>In addition to this problem, there isn&#39;t any monetizable intent within the context of Social Media like you have with search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevenmorvay</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>stevenmorvay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Quick answer to how do you work with 1 second of viewer attention......OFFERS.  Give a reason to click rather than a reson to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick answer to how do you work with 1 second of viewer attention&#8230;&#8230;OFFERS.  Give a reason to click rather than a reson to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Redman</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Redman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quick response.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Depending upon the hood you were raised those are typically nominal costs that aren&#039;t calculated in ROAS... with obviously a ton of additional variables.  Contrary to belief, I still hold regard for the value of social media ad impressions.   I&#039;ve seen wild swings in paid search conversion with social ads.  Affiliate marketers are gobbling them up faster than Kobayashi on a Nathan&#039;s for a reason.  There is no other place that gives hyper-targeting for a .25CPM.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking forward to your banner-blindness post.  I cringe at the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick response.  </p>
<p>Depending upon the hood you were raised those are typically nominal costs that aren&#39;t calculated in ROAS&#8230; with obviously a ton of additional variables.  Contrary to belief, I still hold regard for the value of social media ad impressions.   I&#39;ve seen wild swings in paid search conversion with social ads.  Affiliate marketers are gobbling them up faster than Kobayashi on a Nathan&#39;s for a reason.  There is no other place that gives hyper-targeting for a .25CPM.  </p>
<p>Looking forward to your banner-blindness post.  I cringe at the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotthoffman</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>scotthoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Daniel, thanks for participating in the conversation - I do agree that in order to even have a fighting chance at making a social media banner campaign work, you have to design it specifically for this rapid page surfing behavior. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But at some point the price that you can buy inventory becomes too low...let me explain, in many instances it cost money (fractions of cents) to actually serve the ads, track the ads, manage the the ads, and don&#039;t forget your agencies fee, that it becomes a negative sum game.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My 2 cents - check out my post tomorrow on an &#039;07 study on banner blindness, that further amplifies this issue...thanks again for participating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, thanks for participating in the conversation &#8211; I do agree that in order to even have a fighting chance at making a social media banner campaign work, you have to design it specifically for this rapid page surfing behavior. </p>
<p>But at some point the price that you can buy inventory becomes too low&#8230;let me explain, in many instances it cost money (fractions of cents) to actually serve the ads, track the ads, manage the the ads, and don&#39;t forget your agencies fee, that it becomes a negative sum game.</p>
<p>My 2 cents &#8211; check out my post tomorrow on an &#39;07 study on banner blindness, that further amplifies this issue&#8230;thanks again for participating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Redman</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Redman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-197</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re half right, in my humble opinion.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because engagement time is so low, ads have to be produced to accommodate.  If you only have someones attention for 1 second, what can and would you tell them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s still success to be had there because buys can be so competitive, just don&#039;t even attempt to &#039;tell a story&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re half right, in my humble opinion.  </p>
<p>Because engagement time is so low, ads have to be produced to accommodate.  If you only have someones attention for 1 second, what can and would you tell them?</p>
<p>There&#39;s still success to be had there because buys can be so competitive, just don&#39;t even attempt to &#39;tell a story&#39;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/social-media-banners-dont-work-because-they-dont-have-time-to-be-seen/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1383#comment-196</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by cliqology: Fresh Post: Social Media Banners don&#039;t work because they don&#039;t have time to be seen http://bit.ly/bY7RQA...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by cliqology: Fresh Post: Social Media Banners don&#8217;t work because they don&#8217;t have time to be seen <a href="http://bit.ly/bY7RQA.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bY7RQA..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

