<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s SuperBowl Ad is part of a series; Here are the rest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cliqology.com/2010/02/googles-superbowl-ad-is-part-of-a-series-here-are-the-rest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/googles-superbowl-ad-is-part-of-a-series-here-are-the-rest/</link>
	<description>Social Media is about Cliques not Clicks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The status update just became a little more important #Google #Gmail #Status Update</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/googles-superbowl-ad-is-part-of-a-series-here-are-the-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>The status update just became a little more important #Google #Gmail #Status Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1242#comment-176</guid>
		<description>[...] Hoffman on February 8, 2010   Today seems to be my Google day; this morning I wrote a post about the Search Story ads from Google and followed by another covering the results of a Superbowl spot that aired for Google last night. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hoffman on February 8, 2010   Today seems to be my Google day; this morning I wrote a post about the Search Story ads from Google and followed by another covering the results of a Superbowl spot that aired for Google last night. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google&#8217;s Superbowl ad an arguement for Television advertising?</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2010/02/googles-superbowl-ad-is-part-of-a-series-here-are-the-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google&#8217;s Superbowl ad an arguement for Television advertising?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1242#comment-174</guid>
		<description>[...] during the SuperBowl. The ad was already in circulation on Youtube, and in fact was part of a series of 7 &#8220;search themed&#8221; ads. On Feb 6th Eric Schmidt announced the fact that his company had bought the spot on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] during the SuperBowl. The ad was already in circulation on Youtube, and in fact was part of a series of 7 &#8220;search themed&#8221; ads. On Feb 6th Eric Schmidt announced the fact that his company had bought the spot on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

