<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who should own Social Media, the PR team or the Ad Team? &#8211; The Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cliqology.com/2009/12/who-should-own-social-media-the-pr-team-or-the-ad-team-the-podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cliqology.com/2009/12/who-should-own-social-media-the-pr-team-or-the-ad-team-the-podcast/</link>
	<description>Social Media is about Cliques not Clicks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2009/12/who-should-own-social-media-the-pr-team-or-the-ad-team-the-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1112#comment-119</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by cliqology: Fresh Post: Who should own Social Media, the PR team or the Ad Team? - The Podcast http://bit.ly/8W03Np...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by cliqology: Fresh Post: Who should own Social Media, the PR team or the Ad Team? &#8211; The Podcast <a href="http://bit.ly/8W03Np.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8W03Np..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotthoffman</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2009/12/who-should-own-social-media-the-pr-team-or-the-ad-team-the-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>scotthoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1112#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Thanks and I think that right now it&#039;s an open playing field. The concept of Customer Service was also brought up during the show, and I think that Social Media will have a deep impact on that profession as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In an ideal would PR and Advertising groups should work together, but as I have seen so often, they usually don&#039;t especially at bigger companies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for listening and commenting on the Podcast, I hope you enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks and I think that right now it&#39;s an open playing field. The concept of Customer Service was also brought up during the show, and I think that Social Media will have a deep impact on that profession as well. </p>
<p>In an ideal would PR and Advertising groups should work together, but as I have seen so often, they usually don&#39;t especially at bigger companies.</p>
<p>Thanks for listening and commenting on the Podcast, I hope you enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alichfield</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2009/12/who-should-own-social-media-the-pr-team-or-the-ad-team-the-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>alichfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1112#comment-130</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still PR, it&#039;s still advertising, it just needs more of an &quot;outside-the-box&quot; framework to it. While working in PR can involve Q&amp;A sessions, it&#039;s still, for the most part, built around public releases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I vote that Social media is more of an advertising specialty. They craft the messages which make people think, or even entertain. They need to be bold enough to leave a message which will welcome discussion from their fanbase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, I also think that the two departments should/could work together. After all, marketers are excellent at getting the message out, and PR professionals are well prepared to answer the fan response. (One department could be the &quot;voice&quot;, the other the &quot;ears&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s still PR, it&#39;s still advertising, it just needs more of an &#8220;outside-the-box&#8221; framework to it. While working in PR can involve Q&#038;A sessions, it&#39;s still, for the most part, built around public releases.</p>
<p>I vote that Social media is more of an advertising specialty. They craft the messages which make people think, or even entertain. They need to be bold enough to leave a message which will welcome discussion from their fanbase.</p>
<p>But, I also think that the two departments should/could work together. After all, marketers are excellent at getting the message out, and PR professionals are well prepared to answer the fan response. (One department could be the &#8220;voice&#8221;, the other the &#8220;ears&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotthoffman</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2009/12/who-should-own-social-media-the-pr-team-or-the-ad-team-the-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>scotthoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1112#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Thanks and I think that right now it&#039;s an open playing field. The concept of Customer Service was also brought up during the show, and I think that Social Media will have a deep impact on that profession as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In an ideal would PR and Advertising groups should work together, but as I have seen so often, they usually don&#039;t especially at bigger companies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for listening and commenting on the Podcast, I hope you enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks and I think that right now it&#39;s an open playing field. The concept of Customer Service was also brought up during the show, and I think that Social Media will have a deep impact on that profession as well. </p>
<p>In an ideal would PR and Advertising groups should work together, but as I have seen so often, they usually don&#39;t especially at bigger companies.</p>
<p>Thanks for listening and commenting on the Podcast, I hope you enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alichfield</title>
		<link>http://cliqology.com/2009/12/who-should-own-social-media-the-pr-team-or-the-ad-team-the-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>alichfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cliqology.com/?p=1112#comment-117</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still PR, it&#039;s still advertising, it just needs more of an &quot;outside-the-box&quot; framework to it. While working in PR can involve Q&amp;A sessions, it&#039;s still, for the most part, built around public releases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I vote that Social media is more of an advertising specialty. They craft the messages which make people think, or even entertain. They need to be bold enough to leave a message which will welcome discussion from their fanbase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, I also think that the two departments should/could work together. After all, marketers are excellent at getting the message out, and PR professionals are well prepared to answer the fan response. (One department could be the &quot;voice&quot;, the other the &quot;ears&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s still PR, it&#39;s still advertising, it just needs more of an &#8220;outside-the-box&#8221; framework to it. While working in PR can involve Q&#038;A sessions, it&#39;s still, for the most part, built around public releases.</p>
<p>I vote that Social media is more of an advertising specialty. They craft the messages which make people think, or even entertain. They need to be bold enough to leave a message which will welcome discussion from their fanbase.</p>
<p>But, I also think that the two departments should/could work together. After all, marketers are excellent at getting the message out, and PR professionals are well prepared to answer the fan response. (One department could be the &#8220;voice&#8221;, the other the &#8220;ears&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

